Book Review: The Republic by Plato.
Well, I just finished reading this and I'm trying to put my thoughts in order. Far cleverer people than I have spent millennia debating this one so I'm hesitant to form any firm opinions, but here's some things I noticed:
- It really is very readable, being - as it is - a series of imagined conversations between Plato (cosplaying as Socrates) and various Athenians, and as such it's less daunting than I'd normally expect a philosophical work to be.
- I kept being reminded of Gene Wolfe's prose - whether he and I have read the same translation, or whether this is something inherent in the text, I'm not sure. I did get the distinct impression reading Latro of the Mist that Wolfe was consciously emulating the style of various ancient Greek writers, as part of evoking the setting, but I also noticed that Horn engages in a lot of Socratic dialogues in The Book of the Short Sun. (I can't remember whether Silk also did so in the Long Sun, but I wouldn't be surprised.) Also, Wolfe's use of the term "Whorl" in the Long and Short Suns could potentially be a reference to Plato's cosmological analogy of the Spindle of Necessity.
- The translator in my edition (the Penguin Classics version translated by HPD Lee) does an excellent job of adding notes to the text to show where he has had to make a difficult choice in translating a particular passage.
- It's actually kind of funny in places - especially when Plato-as-Socrates is slapping down a particularly objectionable opponent in debate. Idiots on internet forums use the same logical fallacies that idiots did back in Greece.
- He is angry at the idea that people would say stuff like "God Hates Fags" or "AIDS is God's punishment" or "The Gods/Greys/fairies/Illuminati lurk amongst us in human form" - mainly because he feels this gives a deceptive idea of what God/the Gods is/are actually like, but also because he thinks that it is ultimately harmful to the community for people to say such things. I could go along with that, but he'd censor a heck of a lot of great literature (as well as third-rate fantasy offerings) if he had his way.
- In fact, when he starts in earnest to describe his ideal state - and, in particular, the upbringing and training of the Guardians who will rule it and serve as its military - Plato gets downright authoritarian, to the point where he advocates casting out and reimagining the entire basis of Greek religion for the good of the state, stated that the rulers of a state are allowed to lie to the citizenry for the good of the state, and argued for revision of the Iliad to gloss over Achilles' less noble acts. So that's religious intolerance, state censorship and propaganda, and historical revisionism all in one tasty package (there's also a healthy dose of eugenics). He even suggests that certain musical instruments should be banned, since they are capable of playing inappropriate music.
- On the other hand, in a weird twist he advocates all this repression only for the Guardians, his ruling class, who are apart from the manual labourers and writers and actors and poets and the rest of society. The idea that if anyone should work under tight legal restrictions it's the rulers of a society, not necessarily its people, is still with us today (it's what the US Constitution is based on, after all). Plato does, however, seem to be advocating a ruling caste chosen from birth to rule and trained accordingly. One of the first postulates Plato espouses is that specialisation is vital to society, to the point where each person must devote themselves to one career and one career alone, and social mobility is simply unthinkable.
- On the third hand, Plato firmly forbids the literature and drama he has deemed unsuitable for the education of the Guardians from his ideal state. The restrictions oppressing the Guardians tend to oppress everyone - with exceptions. (For example, the Guardians are not allowed to have personal property and, indeed, are encouraged to not desire it, so that they don't end up putting personal considerations before the public good - although in the other classes wealth is redistributed to prevent pockets of great wealth or great poverty developing.)
- When an objection is raised that the Guardians can't be very happy in their situation, Plato responds that his philosophical model is to do with the happiness of the entire community as opposed to the ruling class, and moreover it is suggested that if the Guardians have been educated properly then chances are they will be happy despite their Spartan lifestyle. This seems to miss the point; if a particular part of the community is oppressed for the good of the rest, that is hardly a moral or a just community in my mind, and if a Guardian is unhappy in his work how can he be expected to love that work? Plato handwaves and says that the Guardians should be encouraged to love and enjoy their work, but doesn't seem to provide them with any incentives to do so.
- According to Plato, an elder man dating a youth is free to kiss his boyfriend and touch him "as a father does his son", but it is a sign of poor moral character to go further than that.
- His ideas about war are rather quaint - he suggests that the children of the Guardians should be sent out on horseback, with a few elders to look after them, to watch the Guardians at war, so that when they grow up they are more prepared for battle. The idea that any general would devote his best horses to allow the nation's children - the best possible hostages the enemy can hope for - to watch the war is ludicrous. (Also, the prize for soldiers who excel themselves is kisses from all the other soldiers, male and female.)
